Independently prepared inter-patrol debating develops core skills
We find that debating gives the pupils the skills and the platform to prepare and present their own opinions on a wide range of subjects, as well as allowing them to consider the views and feelings of others. It also improves pupils’ confidence in persuasive and discursive writing, core skills for later life.
In our inter-patrol debating competition, the children are in charge: they plan, prepare and deliver their motion with their peers, essential for teamwork. No adult involvement.
In the first heat this year, Panthers and Tigers were pitted against each other. Panthers proposed that ‘ Competitive sport should not be played at school.’ Not easy. Their argument was particularly powerful, with Xander O'C leading the way with his extended war analogy. Tigers sprang back with Arina arguing that competitive sport was a vital cog in the Westbourne machine. Panthers won the heat – the judges felt their argument was more compelling.
In the second heat, Otters battled against Owls. Otters proposed that ‘Food should only be eaten if it’s grown in Britain.’ This was right up Mrs Pollock’s (head judge) street as lots of geographical references were made in both patrols’ speeches. Xander even brought in avocados and pineapples to support his points… Owls made strong arguments for food diversity, but Otters emerged triumphant by a whisker.
Onto the finals. Otters proposed that ‘Teachers should wear a uniform.’ The debaters from Otters had obviously done extensive research into this issue, making valid points – especially about not having to spend ages in the morning deciding what to wear. Panthers argued their case adroitly, once again thinking carefully about persuasive devices in their points and citing opinions from various members of staff.
Both arguments were compelling: the judges had a very tricky decision to make.
After much discussion (and debate), the judges voted 2:1 for the Panthers, Safia having swung it for them with some sharp summary ripostes and her engagement with the audience.
